Logo-japid
J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent. Inpress.
doi: 10.34172/japid.4115
  Abstract View: 27

Original Article

A comparative evaluation of implant stability and crestal bone loss in T-PRF-treated and conventional implants: A split-mouth clinical study

Anuraga Tejaswi Thotimpuri 1 ORCID logo, Mohan Kumar Pasupuleti 1* ORCID logo, Gautami Subhadra Penmetsa 1 ORCID logo, Satyanarayana Raju Manthena 2 ORCID logo, Naga Venkata Satya Sruthima Gottumukkala 1 ORCID logo, Konathala Santosh Venkata Ramesh 1 ORCID logo

1 Department of Periodontics and Implantology, Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, India
2 Department of Prosthodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Vishnupur, Bhimavaram, West Godavari, India
*Corresponding Author: Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to compare implant stability and crestal bone loss between titanium platelet-rich fibrin (T-PRF)-treated implants and conventional implants.

Methods: A prospective, randomized, split-mouth clinical trial was conducted in 10 healthy patients, with 20 implants per mouth (test and control). Each patient received one T-PRF-treated implant and one conventional implant. Implant stability was assessed using implant stability quotient (ISQ) at placement and at 3 months. Crestal bone loss was evaluated radiographically at 3 and 6 months. Soft tissue parameters were assessed at follow-up visits.

Results: The T-PRF group showed higher ISQ values and reduced bone loss, with trends favoring the intervention at the three-month follow-up compared with the control group. Bone loss at three and six months was lower around anterior implants in the T-PRF group than in the control group. At this time, T-PRF may help improve soft tissue measurements; however, the measured values did not differ significantly from those of the control groups. Due to limitations such as a small sample size, a relatively short follow-up period, and varying baseline crestal bone levels, these findings should be interpreted with caution.

Conclusion: Due to the restrictions of this split-mouth study, T-PRF-treated sites showed a trend towards increased early implant stability and decreased crestal bone loss compared to control sites. However, because of the small sample size and short follow-up period, conclusive evidence cannot be drawn about the clinical superiority of T-PRF. Further appropriately powered randomized controlled trials with prolonged follow-up periods are necessary to determine the long-term clinical efficacy of T-PRF in implant therapy. Clinical Trial Registration number: CTRI/2022/11/047159.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 28

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

PDF Download: 0

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Submitted: 24 Oct 2025
Revision: 05 Jun 2026
Accepted: 08 Jun 2026
ePublished: 27 Aug 2026
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)