Logo-japid
J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent. Inpress.
doi: 10.34172/japid.026.3931
  Abstract View: 177

Short communication

Comparative assessment of functional groups and surface morphology of dental and peri-implant calculus: A cross-sectional study

Behzad Houshmand 1 ORCID logo, Anahita Moscowchi 2 ORCID logo, Helia Faeli 1 ORCID logo, Parsa Dayani 1* ORCID logo

1 Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Dental Research Center, Research Institute for Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction: This research aimed to compare functional groups and surface morphology of dental and peri-implant calculus.

Methods: Six patients with dental implants in the anterior lower jaw were included. Calculus samples were collected from the implant surfaces and the corresponding contralateral natural teeth. Fouriertransform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) analyses were performed.

Results: Distinct differences were observed between dental and peri-implant calculus in both functional groups and surface structure. FTIR analysis revealed higher intensity of oxygen-related bond peaks around 3426–3428 cm-1 in implant calculus, along with increased signals for C=C stretching near 1646–1649 cm-1, suggesting variations in the organic matrix. Additional peaks at 2919–2921 cm- ¹ and 1451–1456 cm- ¹ were present in both groups, indicating aliphatic C–H bonds. FESEM imaging revealed that dental calculus had a compact surface, dense microbial plaque, and minimal porosity. In contrast, peri-implant calculus displayed a layered architecture with multiple pores ranging from approximately 1–3 µm in diameter. These morphological differences suggest divergent mineralization patterns and biofilm retention mechanisms.

Conclusion: These differences suggest distinct mechanisms of plaque retention and mineralization in peri-implant versus natural tooth environments, potentially influenced by environmental and biological factors. These findings may offer insights that inform preventive strategies and ultimately improve implant longevity.


First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 178

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

PDF Download: 0

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Submitted: 15 Jul 2025
Revision: 12 Nov 2025
Accepted: 24 Feb 2026
ePublished: 24 May 2026
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)